Change set

Pick exam & year, then Go.

Question map
Not attempted Correct Incorrect Bookmarked
Loading…
Q23 (IAS/2018) Economy › Schemes, Inclusion & Social Sector › Quality and safety standards Official Key

Consider the following statements : 1. The Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 replaced the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. 2. The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) is under the charge of Director General of Health Services in the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

Result
Your answer:  ·  Correct: A
Explanation

The correct answer is option A (1 only).

**Statement 1 is correct:** The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, along with various other Central Acts like Fruit Products Order 1955, Meat Food Products Order 1973, and others, were repealed after the enactment of Food Safety and Standards (FSS) Act 2006.[1] This consolidation was done to streamline food safety regulations in India.

**Statement 2 is incorrect:** The Central Government established the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) as an independent body to exercise powers and perform functions under the Act.[2] The authority functions under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.[3] However, FSSAI is not under the charge of the Director General of Health Services; it operates as an autonomous statutory body with its own Chairperson and administrative structure, though it functions within the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

Therefore, only statement 1 is correct.

Sources
  1. [1] Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 12: Supply Chain and Food Processing Industry > 12.7 FSS Act 2006 and FSSAI > p. 373
  2. [2] https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/acts_parliament/2006/the-food-safety-and-standards-act-2006.pdf
How others answered
Each bar shows the % of students who chose that option. Green bar = correct answer, blue outline = your choice.
Community Performance
Out of everyone who attempted this question.
73%
got it right
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest preview
Don’t just practise – reverse-engineer the question. This panel shows where this PYQ came from (books / web), how the examiner broke it into hidden statements, and which nearby micro-concepts you were supposed to learn from it. Treat it like an autopsy of the question: what might have triggered it, which exact lines in the book matter, and what linked ideas you should carry forward to future questions.
Q. Consider the following statements : 1. The Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 replaced the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. …
At a glance
Origin: Mixed / unclear origin Fairness: Moderate fairness Books / CA: 5/10 · 0/10
You're seeing a guest preview. The Verdict and first statement analysis are open. Login with Google to unlock all tabs.

Statement 1 is standard static material found in every Economy book under 'Food Processing'. Statement 2 is a classic 'Administrative Hierarchy Trap'—UPSC loves confusing a Statutory Authority's autonomy with a subordinate office's reporting line. If you knew FSSAI is an autonomous statutory body, you could guess it doesn't report to a Director General.

How this question is built

This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.

Statement 1
Did the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (India) replace the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954?
Origin: Direct from books Fairness: Straightforward Book-answerable
From standard books
Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 13: Food Processing Industry in India > Controllable Challenges > p. 412
Presence: 5/5
“13.6 Indian Economy 6. Provisions of the Food Safety & Standards Act, 2006, which replaced the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, are not being effectively complied by the related stakeholders.”
Why this source?
  • Explicitly states the Food Safety & Standards Act, 2006 'replaced the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954'.
  • Direct phrasing indicates statutory replacement rather than mere amendment or related change.
Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 12: Supply Chain and Food Processing Industry > 12.7 FSS Act 2006 and FSSAI > p. 373
Presence: 5/5
“Introduction: The subject of "adulteration of foodstuffs and the production, supply and distribution of foodstuffs" comes under concurrent list. The various Central Acts like Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Fruit Products Order 1955, Meat Food Products Order 1973, Vegetable Oil Products (Control) Order, 1947, Edible Oils Packaging (Regulation) Order 1988, De-Oiled Meal and Edible Flour (Control) Order, 1967, Milk and Milk Products Order, 1992 etc. were repealed after the enactment of Food Safety and Standards (FSS) Act 2006.”
Why this source?
  • Lists the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 among central Acts that 'were repealed after the enactment of Food Safety and Standards (FSS) Act 2006'.
  • Confirms legal repeal of earlier food laws following the FSS Act 2006, supporting the replacement claim.
How to study

This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.

Login with Google to unlock study guidance.

Micro-concepts

Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.

Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.

The Vault

Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.

Login with Google to unlock The Vault.

✓ Thank you! We'll review this.

SIMILAR QUESTIONS

4 Cross-Linked PYQs

UPSC repeats concepts across years. Login to see how this question connects to 4 others.

Login with Google