Right to Privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of Right to Life and Personal Liberty. Which of the following in the Constitution of India correctly and appropriately imply the above statement ?

States that the Supreme Court (K.S. Puttaswamy) declared right to privacy as intrinsic to right to life and personal liberty under Article 21.

A student could use this precedent as a baseline and then check whether Article 14 or the 42nd Amendment were relied upon or discussed in that judgment to support privacy.

Notes that rights such as travel abroad and privacy have been deduced from Article 21 (and sometimes Article 19) in landmark cases like Maneka and Puttaswamy.

One could examine the patterns of judicial deduction from Article 21 to see whether Article 14 or amendment provisions have been used similarly to ground privacy.

Shows an exam question that explicitly asks which constitutional provisions (including 'Article 14 and the provisions under the 42nd Amendment') correctly imply the given statement — indicating this combination is a recognized line of inquiry.

A student could trace the sources tested by such questions to find legislative text or case law tying Article 14/42nd Amendment to privacy claims.

Records that Article 31D was inserted by the 42nd Amendment (and later repealed), showing the 42nd Amendment did alter fundamental-rights-related provisions.

A student might inspect the specific provisions added by the 42nd Amendment (and their subject matter) to judge whether they could be read to affect privacy or Article 21 interpretations.

Clarifies that Article 14 (equality before law/equal protection) is a fundamental right available to any person, distinct from Article 21 which protects life and personal liberty.

One could analyze whether principles of equality under Article 14 have been used by courts to support privacy claims as an incident of Article 21 rights.