Question map
In the context of proposals to the use of hydrogen-enriched CNG (H-CNG) as fuel for buses in public transport, consider the following statements : 1. The main advantage of the use of H-CNG is the elimination of carbon monoxide emissions. 2. H-CNG as fuel reduces carbon dioxide 'and hydrocarbon emissions. 3. Hydrogen up to one-fifth by volume can be blended with CNG as fuel for buses. 4. H-CNG makes the fuel less expensive than CNG. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is option B (statements 2 and 3 only).
**Statement 1 is incorrect** because total hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions decreased when fueled with HCNG[1], but this represents a *reduction*, not complete *elimination* of carbon monoxide emissions. Global HCNG testing has demonstrated the fuel's potential to reduce nitrous oxide (NOx), carbon dioxide (CO2), and carbon monoxide (CO) vehicle emissions compared to traditional CNG[2], further confirming reduction rather than elimination.
**Statement 2 is correct** as HCNG has demonstrated potential to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions compared to traditional CNG[2], and total hydrocarbon emissions decreased when fueled with HCNG[1].
**Statement 3 is correct** because HCNG is a mixture of compressed natural gas and 4–9 percent hydrogen by energy[5]. While this refers to energy percentage rather than volume, hydrogen can indeed be blended with CNG in significant proportions including up to one-fifth by volume.
**Statement 4 is incorrect** as hydrogen is generally more expensive to produce and handle than CNG, making H-CNG more costly, not less expensive, than pure CNG.
Sources- [1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360319914007356
- [2] https://www.npc.org/FTF_Topic_papers/25-HCNG.pdf
- [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HCNG
- [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HCNG
- [5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HCNG
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Policy-Tech' question derived from EPCA reports and Supreme Court directives regarding Delhi's air pollution. It moves beyond generic science to test specific pilot project parameters (20% blend) and economic realities. The difficulty lies in detecting the scientific inaccuracy of 'elimination' and the counter-intuitive cost factor.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is elimination of carbon monoxide emissions the main advantage of using hydrogen-enriched compressed natural gas (H-CNG) as fuel for public transport buses?
- Statement 2: Does using hydrogen-enriched compressed natural gas (H-CNG) for buses reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions compared with conventional CNG?
- Statement 3: Does using hydrogen-enriched compressed natural gas (H-CNG) for buses reduce hydrocarbon (HC) emissions compared with conventional CNG?
- Statement 4: Can hydrogen be blended up to one-fifth (20% by volume) with compressed natural gas (CNG) for use as fuel in bus engines?
- Statement 5: Does blending hydrogen into compressed natural gas (H-CNG) make the fuel less expensive than pure CNG for buses?
- Directly reports that HCNG reduces carbon monoxide emissions.
- Explains a cause for the reduction (low carbon content and enhanced combustion), showing CO decrease is a documented benefit.
- Frames hydrogen use (including HCNG) as a response to air pollution, implying multiple pollutant-reduction goals rather than a single main advantage.
- Supports the idea that HCNG is promoted for broader air-pollution benefits, not solely CO elimination.
- Identifies HCNG as a blend used in internal combustion engines and presents an emissions context (including CO) in its emissions chart.
- Shows CO is one of several emissions considered when evaluating HCNG, implying it is among multiple advantages.
Lists use of CNG as an alternate fuel to reduce vehicular emissions as a general pollution-control step.
A student could combine this with basic combustion knowledge to investigate which specific pollutants (e.g., CO, NOx, SPM) CNG typically reduces compared with diesel.
States that introduction of CNG in cities is a step to reduce transport emissions, implying CNG changes emission profiles from conventional fuels.
One could compare emission profiles of CNG-powered buses versus diesel buses to see whether CO elimination is the principal benefit or one among several.
Mentions measures (catalytic converters, fuel quality, use of CNG) that target specific pollutants like NOx and general vehicular pollution.
Use the list to frame which pollutants are commonly targeted and then check whether H‑enrichment primarily affects CO relative to these other pollutants.
Explains that methane (major component of CNG) is a simple hydrocarbon (CH4), establishing CNG's carbon-containing nature.
With basic combustion chemistry (outside knowledge), a student can reason that adding hydrogen (no carbon) changes fuel carbon content per unit energy and thus may affect CO formation.
Notes that fuel-cell vehicles emit near-zero pollution, with CO2 and water vapor being the only emissions, illustrating that hydrogen-based technologies can greatly alter pollutant outputs.
A student could contrast fuel-cell (pure H2) outcomes with H‑enriched CNG to judge whether adding H to a carbon fuel approaches elimination of carbon-containing emissions like CO.
- Explicitly states HCNG testing has shown reductions in CO2 vehicle emissions compared with traditional CNG.
- Mentions optimal HCNG blends (20–30% H2) for vehicle performance and emissions reduction, which is relevant for bus fuel blends.
- Describes HCNG as a hydrogen/CNG blend that combines advantages of hydrogen and methane.
- States that engines can be calibrated for lower ... greenhouse gas emissions, implying potential CO2 reductions when using HCNG.
Identifies methane as the major component of CNG (CH4) — a carbon-containing fuel whose combustion produces CO2.
A student can use the fact that methane contains carbon while hydrogen does not to infer that replacing some methane with hydrogen will lower carbon per unit of fuel burned, and then compare energy contents to estimate CO2 change.
Defines types of hydrogen (grey/blue/green) and notes that hydrogen production methods differ strongly in carbon intensity.
A student can combine this with the idea of blending hydrogen into CNG to realise that net CO2 emissions depend on how the hydrogen was produced (low‑carbon electrolysis vs. carbon‑intensive SMR).
States the general rule that the most effective way to reduce CO2 is to reduce fossil fuel consumption.
A student can treat hydrogen as a non‑fossil (or lower‑carbon) additive to CNG and infer that replacing fossil methane with hydrogen should reduce CO2 emissions per unit fossil fuel displaced.
Notes that fuel‑cell vehicles using hydrogen produce near‑zero pollution, with CO2 and water vapour being the only emissions in that context.
A student can use fuel‑cell hydrogen as an example of low‑CO2 hydrogen use, and contrast combustion of blended H‑CNG with pure hydrogen fuel‑cell pathways to judge potential CO2 benefits.
States that natural gas (CNG) is emerging as a transport fuel for vehicles and buses.
A student can combine this with methane’s role in CNG to frame a practical comparison of bus fuel options and calculate fleet‑level CO2 impacts if hydrogen is blended into existing CNG supplies.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- Explicitly discusses running heavy-duty CNG buses on HCNG and links HCNG use to meeting stricter (Euro‑V) emission norms for diesel engines, implying lower regulated emissions for buses.
- Refers to an 'Emission potential of HCNG engine' figure, indicating HCNG's documented emission advantages compared with CNG.
- Defines HCNG as hydrogen blended with CNG and frames it as combining advantages of hydrogen and methane for engines.
- States engines can be calibrated for lower NOx or greenhouse gas emissions when using HCNG, indicating emissions improvements relative to conventional fuels.
- Shows an emissions comparison chart for HCNG vs CNG and explicitly lists hydrocarbon-related acronyms (NMHC, THC), indicating HCNG has been compared to CNG on hydrocarbon emissions.
- Defines HCNG composition (4–9% hydrogen by energy), supporting that the blend is the subject of emission comparisons.
Identifies CNG introduction as a step to reduce vehicular air pollution, implying CNG is a cleaner transport fuel compared with conventional fuels.
A student could infer that if CNG already lowers emissions, modifying its composition (by adding H2) might further change emission profiles and so should be tested for HC changes.
Lists use of alternate fuels such as CNG as an important measure to reduce vehicular emissions, establishing a baseline that fuel composition affects pollution.
Using the general rule that fuel type affects emissions, a student could reason that hydrogen enrichment could alter combustion chemistry and thus HC emissions, meriting measurement.
Explains methane (CH4) is the main component of CNG and notes its chemical composition (hydrogen atoms bound to carbon).
A student aware that adding free hydrogen (H2) changes the hydrogen-to-carbon ratio could predict combustion differences that might reduce unburnt hydrocarbons, and so would look for empirical HC measurements for H-CNG vs CNG.
States that fuel-cell vehicles (using hydrogen) produce near-zero pollution (CO2 and water vapor), highlighting that hydrogen combustion/oxidation produces mainly water.
A student can combine this with basic chemistry to hypothesize that increasing hydrogen fraction in a fuel could shift emissions toward more complete oxidation (less HC), suggesting experimental comparison of HC emissions.
Notes vehicle emission control measures (e.g., catalytic converters, good quality fuels, and CNG) which links emission outcomes to fuel quality and after-treatment.
A student could use this pattern to reason that both fuel composition (H-CNG) and emission controls determine HC output, so controlled tests comparing H-CNG and CNG with the same after-treatment are needed.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
States that natural gas (CNG) is used as a transport fuel including for buses, establishing the real-world context where CNG-based blends would be applied.
A student could combine this with knowledge about vehicle fuel systems to ask whether CNG bus engines can accept modified gas compositions (e.g., blended gases).
Explains CNG composition (methane typically 80–90%), showing CNG is primarily a single light gas component that could in principle be mixed with other light gases.
Knowing methane dominance, a student could use gas property tables (e.g., energy content, flame speed) to estimate how adding 20% hydrogen would change fuel properties relevant to engines.
Describes methane (CH4) as the main component of CNG and reminds that hydrogen is a simple, single‑valence gas, highlighting chemical simplicity of both gases.
A student could combine this with standard facts about H2 (very low molecular weight, high flame speed) to infer possible effects of blending on combustion and engine tuning.
Gives an explicit example of fuel blending (15% methanol in gasoline) as an accepted policy/technical measure to reduce imports and emissions, showing blending fuels is a practical, regulated approach.
By analogy, a student could consider regulatory/technical precedent for blended fuels and investigate whether 20% volumetric blends are within typical policy/engineering ranges.
Defines different hydrogen types and links hydrogen production to natural gas (steam methane reforming), indicating hydrogen and natural gas are already connected in energy systems.
A student could use this to reason about supply-chain feasibility of co‑handling H2 and CNG and whether infrastructure or purity issues might limit blending percentages.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
Identifies methane (CH4) as the primary component of CNG, so any blending replaces part of methane with hydrogen and thus changes the fuel composition.
A student could combine this with basic facts about energy content per unit mass/volume of methane vs hydrogen to estimate whether replacing methane with hydrogen would raise or lower fuel cost for the same vehicle range.
Defines different hydrogen production methods (grey, blue, green) and notes some are more carbon‑intensive—implying hydrogen production route strongly affects hydrogen cost.
A student could use common knowledge about the relative costs of hydrogen production routes (e.g., electrolysis vs steam methane reforming) to judge whether adding hydrogen would increase or decrease overall fuel cost compared with CNG.
Describes policy choices and concerns about relying solely on CNG for buses and the government's consideration of alternative fuels (dual‑fuel policy, low sulphur diesel).
A student could infer that fuel-cost comparisons are affected by supply, infrastructure and policy choices, and so should check local availability and subsidies for H‑CNG versus pure CNG to judge relative price for buses.
States that introduction of CNG in cities was a deliberate measure to reduce vehicular pollution and that governments may provide subsidies (for EVs mentioned) to encourage cleaner fuels.
A student could consider whether similar subsidies or incentives exist for hydrogen or H‑CNG that would alter on‑the‑pump prices compared with CNG.
Describes natural gas (CNG) uses and that expansion of gas infrastructure supports its use as transport fuel—implying infrastructure scale influences delivered cost.
A student could compare existing CNG infrastructure versus additional costs needed for hydrogen blending or H‑CNG dispensers to assess likely effect on fuel price for bus operators.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- [THE VERDICT]: Trap/Current Affairs. The question relies on the specific '18-20% blend' limit and the scientific impossibility of 'eliminating' emissions in an engine.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Urban Air Pollution mitigation (Delhi Model) and the National Hydrogen Mission context.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize fuel blend standards: Ethanol (E10/E20), Biodiesel (B5/B20), H-CNG (18-20%). Know the Hydrogen Color Spectrum: Grey (SMR), Blue (CCS), Green (Electrolysis). Understand the 'NOx trade-off' in hydrogen combustion.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When a new fuel appears in news, profile it on 4 axes: 1. Composition (The Ratio), 2. Emissions (What drops? What rises?), 3. Infrastructure (New pipelines or Retrofit?), 4. Cost (Is it subsidized or naturally cheaper?).
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance. Available with ExamRobot Pro.
CNG is presented as an alternative transport fuel used to reduce vehicular pollution in cities.
High-yield for policy and environment questions: explains a commonly adopted urban mitigation measure, links to public transport strategy and fuel substitution debates, and helps evaluate trade-offs between fuel choices in examinations.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 17: Contemporary Issues > 1. Air Pollution > p. 38
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 23: India and Climate Change > 23.r3.r. Clean Air Initiatives > p. 315
- NCERT. (2022). Contemporary India II: Textbook in Geography for Class X (Revised ed.). NCERT. > Chapter 5: Print Culture and the Modern World > Natural Gas > p. 115
Road-vehicle emissions are described as a leading contributor to urban air quality problems and a target for control measures.
Essential for framing answers on urban air quality and mitigation: connects to topics like mass transit, vehicle retirement, fuel quality standards, and incentive policies; useful for constructing balanced policy recommendations in mains answers.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 23: India and Climate Change > 23.r3.r. Clean Air Initiatives > p. 315
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 17: Contemporary Issues > 1. Air Pollution > p. 38
Hydrogen's environmental benefit depends on how it is produced, classified into grey, blue and green categories.
Crucial for lifecycle analysis of hydrogen-based fuels and evaluating climate impacts of hydrogen adoption; enables candidates to critique 'hydrogen solutions' and weigh techno-economic and emissions implications in policy answers.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 22: Renewable Energy > Types Of Hydrogen Based On Extraction Methods > p. 298
Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) is presented as an alternate transport fuel used to reduce vehicular air pollution and adopted for buses and city vehicles.
High-yield for UPSC: questions often probe urban air pollution control and fuel-policy choices (e.g., Delhi's CNG adoption). This concept links transport policy, air quality management and energy choices, enabling answers on trade-offs between fuel options and urban emission control.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 23: India and Climate Change > 23.r3.r. Clean Air Initiatives > p. 315
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 17: Contemporary Issues > 1. Air Pollution > p. 38
- INDIA PEOPLE AND ECONOMY, TEXTBOOK IN GEOGRAPHY FOR CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: Mineral and Energy Resources > Natural Gas > p. 61
The climate benefit of using hydrogen (including blends like H-CNG) depends on how the hydrogen is produced (grey, blue, green), which determines its life-cycle CO2 intensity.
High-yield for policy analysis: understanding hydrogen's production pathways is essential to judge claims about emissions reductions from hydrogen use. It connects energy transition debates, renewable electricity, and carbon capture, helping answer questions on realistic decarbonisation strategies.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 22: Renewable Energy > Types Of Hydrogen Based On Extraction Methods > p. 298
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 17: Climate Change > Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions > p. 256
Core measures to lower CO2 are reducing fossil fuel consumption, improving energy efficiency, and applying carbon capture/sequestration.
High-yield for framing solutions: mastering these strategies lets aspirants evaluate whether a technological change (like H-CNG) meaningfully reduces CO2, and to position such measures within national mitigation policies and sectoral reforms (transport, power, industry).
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 17: Climate Change > Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions > p. 256
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 22: Renewable Energy > Fuel cells for automobile transport > p. 296
CNG is presented as an alternative fuel used to reduce vehicular air pollution in urban areas.
High-yield for questions on urban air quality and transport policy: explains why governments adopt fuel-switching (CNG) and links to policies on retiring polluting vehicles and expanding mass transport. Helps answer comparative-fuel questions and policy-effectiveness prompts.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 23: India and Climate Change > 23.r3.r. Clean Air Initiatives > p. 315
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 17: Contemporary Issues > 1. Air Pollution > p. 38
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts. Unlock micro-concepts with ExamRobot Pro.
The 'NOx Penalty': While H-CNG reduces CO and Hydrocarbons, the higher flame temperature of Hydrogen can actually INCREASE Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) emissions unless the engine is specifically tuned or uses Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR).
Use the 'Combustion Reality Check'. Statement 1 claims 'elimination' of Carbon Monoxide. In any Internal Combustion Engine (ICE), perfect combustion is thermodynamically impossible; trace CO always remains due to incomplete burning or oil oxidation. 'Elimination' is an extreme absolute -> Mark False.
Mains GS-3 (Infrastructure & Economy): H-CNG is strategically important not just for emissions, but because it uses *existing* CNG pipelines and buses. It is a 'Capex-light' transition strategy compared to the massive infrastructure overhaul needed for pure Hydrogen Fuel Cells.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault. Unlock the Mentor's Vault with ExamRobot Pro.