With reference to the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, consider the following statements : While any resolution for the removal of the lok sabha is under consideration 1. He/She shall not preside. 2. He/She shall not have the right to speak. 3. He/She shall not be entitled to vote on the resolution in the first instance. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

The correct answer is option A (1 only).

When a resolution for the removal of the Speaker is under consideration of the House, he/she cannot preside at the sitting of the House, though he/she may be present.[1] This makes **Statement 1 correct**.

However, he/she can speak and take part in the proceedings of the House at such a time and vote in the first instance, though not in the case of an equality of votes.[1] This clearly establishes that **Statement 2 is incorrect** (the Speaker has the right to speak) and **Statement 3 is incorrect** (the Speaker is entitled to vote in the first instance).

The Constitution provides these rights to ensure the Speaker can defend themselves during removal proceedings. The only restriction is on presiding over the House during such deliberations, which ensures procedural fairness. The Speaker's voting right is limited only in case of tie-breaking votes, not on the first instance of voting on the resolution itself.

1. [1] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 230