Change set
Pick exam & year, then Go.
Question map
With reference to Union Budget, consider the following statements : 1. The Union Finance Minister on behalf of the Prime Minister lays the Annual Financial Statement before both the Houses of Parliament. 2. At the Union level, no demand for a grant can be made except on the recommendation of the President of India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option C (Both 1 and 2), based on the UPSC Official Answer Key 2024.
- Statement 1 is considered correct: Although Article 112 of the Constitution states that the President shall cause the Annual Financial Statement to be laid before Parliament, the UPSC Official Key accepts the statement that the Finance Minister lays it on behalf of the Prime Minister (Head of Government). This reflects the practical parliamentary convention.
- Statement 2 is correct: According to Article 113(3) of the Constitution, no demand for a grant shall be made except on the recommendation of the President of India.
Note: While strict constitutional interpretation favors Option B, the Official Key establishes Option C as the correct answer for this question.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Constitutional Text vs. TV Visuals' trap. While you see the Finance Minister speaking on TV, the Constitution (Art. 112) assigns the duty to the President. Statement 2 is a verbatim lift from Article 113. The question tests if you can distinguish between the 'formal authority' (President) and the 'functional agent' (Minister).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Explicitly states who causes the Annual Financial Statement to be laid before Parliament.
- Identifies the 'annual financial statement' (the Budget) as being laid before both Houses by the President.
- Cites Article 112 and repeats that the President shall cause the Annual Financial Statement to be laid before both Houses.
- Defines the Annual Financial Statement as the Budget, reinforcing that the President is the authority to lay it before Parliament.
- Provides the constitutional text (Article 112) specifying the President's duty to lay the Annual Financial Statement before both Houses.
- Makes clear the formal responsibility rests with the President, not with a Minister or Prime Minister in the quoted text.
States that the President 'shall cause to be laid before both the Houses of Parliament a statement ...' (the Annual Financial Statement) â identifies the constitutional source (Article 112) for who 'causes' the statement to be laid.
A student could combine this constitutional attribution to the President with knowledge that the President normally acts on aid-and-advice of the Council of Ministers to ask whether a minister (not the PM) practically presents it.
Reiterates that financial business 'starts with the presenting of the Annual Financial Statement' and that it 'is caused to be laid by the President before both Houses' â emphasises the constitutional/formal actor is the President.
Use this formal assignment plus practical parliamentary procedure to probe who physically presents the Statement in each House.
Explains actual parliamentary practice: 'The General Budget is presented in Lok Sabha by the finance minister ... and after the speech it is presented in the Rajya Sabha.'
Combine this practice with the constitutional provision that the President 'causes' the Statement to be laid to infer a distinction between formal (President) and practical (Finance Minister) roles.
FRBM-related text says 'The finance minister shall review ... and place before both Houses of Parliament the outcome of such reviews' and requires several fiscal statements to be laid 'along with the budget document' â showing a statutory role for the Finance Minister in placing fiscal documents before both Houses.
A student could extend this pattern to argue that the Finance Minister routinely performs the tangible act of laying financial statements before Parliament, even if the President is the constitutional source.
States as a general rule that 'a minister is appointed by President only on the advice of Prime Minister' â showing the PM's central role in ministerial appointments and influence over ministers.
A student might combine this with the evidence that the Finance Minister presents the budget to infer whether the Finance Minister acts 'on behalf of' the PM (i.e., as the PM's ministerial agent), noting this is an inference rather than a documented procedural fact in the snippets.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.
SIMILAR QUESTIONS
5 Cross-Linked PYQs
UPSC repeats concepts across years. Login to see how this question connects to 5 others.
Login with Google