Change set

Pick exam & year, then Go.

Question map
Not attempted Correct Incorrect ★ Bookmarked
Loading…
Q1 (NDA-II/2012) History & Culture › Modern India (Pre-1857) › Socio-religious reform movements Answer Verified

The Jury Act of 1827 was opposed by many Indians. One of the grounds for opposing it was that it denied both to the Hindus and Mohammedans, the honour of a seat on the Grand Jury. Which among the following was known for his opposition to the Jury Act?

Result
Your answer: —  Â·  Correct: D
Explanation

Raja Rammohan Roy was a pioneering figure in the defense of civil liberties and legal rights in India. He strongly opposed the Jury Act of 1827, which introduced religious discrimination into the judicial system. The Act stipulated that while Christians could serve on juries for both Christians and non-Christians, Hindus and Muslims were barred from sitting on juries involving Christians. Furthermore, it denied Indians the honor of serving on the Grand Jury. Roy organized a petition against this Act, signed by both Hindus and Muslims, and sent it to the British Parliament, arguing that such discriminatory laws undermined the principle of equality before the law. His activism against the Jury Act is considered one of the earliest instances of organized constitutional protest in modern India, reflecting his broader commitment to socio-religious and administrative reforms [1].

Sources

  1. [1] https://ddceutkal.ac.in/Syllabus/MA_history/paper-22.pdf
How others answered
Each bar shows the % of students who chose that option. Green bar = correct answer, blue outline = your choice.
Community Performance
Out of everyone who attempted this question.
37%
got it right
✓ Thank you! We'll review this.

SIMILAR QUESTIONS

5 Cross-Linked PYQs

UPSC repeats concepts across years. Login to see how this question connects to 5 others.

Login with Google