Change set
Pick exam & year, then Go.
Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. According to the Constitution of India, a person who is eligible to vote can be made a minister in a State for six months even if he/she is not a member of the Legislature of that State. 2. According to the Representation of People Act, 1951, a person convicted of a criminal offence and sentenced to imprisonment for five years is permanently disqualified from contesting an election even after his release from prison. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 4 (Neither 1 nor 2) because both statements contain factual inaccuracies regarding constitutional and legal provisions.
- Statement 1 is incorrect: Article 164(4) allows a non-legislator to be a minister for six months. However, the eligibility to vote (18 years) is not the same as the eligibility to be a minister. To be a minister, one must meet the qualifications for the State Legislature under Article 173, which requires a minimum age of 25 years (for Legislative Assembly). Thus, a 19-year-old voter cannot be a minister.
- Statement 2 is incorrect: Section 8(3) of the Representation of People Act, 1951, states that a person convicted and sentenced to at least two years is disqualified from the date of conviction and shall continue to be disqualified for a further period of six years since his release. It is not a permanent disqualification.
Since both statements are legally flawed, Option 4 is the right choice.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a 'Precision Test' disguised as a simple Polity question. Statement 1 is a classic 'Age Trap' (Voter=18 vs Minister=25), while Statement 2 tests your knowledge of the 'Reformation Principle' in Indian law (bans are rarely permanent). If you mentally auto-corrected 'eligible to vote' to 'qualified to be a member', you walked into the trap.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Explicitly says a person who is not a member of either House of the state legislature can be appointed as a minister.
- Explicitly requires that such a person must become a member (by election or nomination) of either House within six months or else cease to be a minister.
- States a person who is not a member of the state legislature can be appointed as Chief Minister for six months.
- Specifies that the person must be elected to the state legislature within that six-month period or cease to hold office, reinforcing the six-month requirement for state executive appointments.
- Confirms the constitutional principle that a non-member may be appointed as a minister but cannot continue for more than six months unless he/she secures a seat in either House (here stated for Parliament).
- Provides a parallel Union-level formulation of the same six-month rule, supporting the general constitutional practice.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.
SIMILAR QUESTIONS
4 Cross-Linked PYQs
UPSC repeats concepts across years. Login to see how this question connects to 4 others.
Login with Google